RELEASE: “Good REDD” Fully Protects and Restores Old Forest Carbon and Local Livelihoods

All Copenhagen bound climate parties urged to get back to basics of avoiding deforestation and degradation as a keystone climate change response. The focus must be upon ending first time industrial logging of primary forests, while providing local peoples alternative incomes based upon fully intact standing old forests. Anything less is unworthy of green support.
By Earth's Newsdesk, a project of EcoInternet (EI)
CONTACT: Dr. Glen Barry, glenbarry@ecologicalinternet.org
Old forests key to climate stability EcoInternet and Rainforest Rescue of Germany have launched a campaign leading to Copenhagen's climate talks in December to ensure carbon based funding for forest protection — called avoided deforestation [search], or Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) [search] — remains ecologically and socially rigorous, or does not proceed at all. REDD has the potential to help end primary and old-growth forest logging and other industrial destruction and diminishment of old forests.
The REDD concept faces immediate risk of being usurped by industry. The focus in project design remains primarily upon profit-making and greenwashing “Sustainable Forest Management”, rather than necessary policies to ensure large areas of primary and old-growth forests are fully protected to optimally keep existing and new carbon sequestered. It is even being suggested that first time logging of primary forests and establishment of industrial tree plantations should be worthy of carbon market financing.


“For two decades we have been working for international payments to landowners to fully protect their ancient forests. We aren't about to let a bunch of city-slicker carbon cowboys tell us logging a sixty million year old rainforest more carefully somehow helps the climate, biodiversity or local peoples,” explains Dr. Glen Barry, EcoInternet's President.
The campaign seeks to highlight elements of “Good REDD” that are necessary minimum preconditions for environmentalists' support, and without which REDD should be scrapped. REDD should only pay for strict protections of primary forests and ecological restoration of natural forests to old-growth status. Good REDD includes full-informed local consent and the vast majority of benefits flowing back to local forest dependent peoples. Ideally REDD funds will come from a non-speculative source such as an aviation tax, and not from carbon market offsets that allow the rich to continue polluting.
“Old Forests are key to sustaining climate, ecosystems, biodiversity, humanity and the Earth System. All of our shared survivals depends upon paying local peoples and governments to protect and restore old forests, while helping local peoples and governments benefit from them remaining standing and fully intact. Good REDD is the single most important thing that can be done to maintain a habitable Earth,” notes Dr. Barry.
As part of the campaign to “Protect and Restore Old Forests Globally”, EcoInternet and Rainforest Rescue have launched a twitter account at http://twitter.com/oldforests and a Facebook cause accessible at http://www.facebook.com/ecointernet and http://www.facebook.com/rainforestrescue . Those committed to ending industrial development of old forests are encouraged to follow and participate in the campaign there.
### ENDS ###
EcoInternet provides the world's largest and most used climate, rainforest and environment portals at http://www.climateark.org/ and http://www.ecoearth.info/ and http://www.rainforestportal.org/ . Dr. Glen Barry is a leading global spokesperson on behalf of environmental sustainability policy. He frequently conducts interviews on the latest climate, forest and water policy developments and can be reached at: glenbarry@ecologicalinternet.org

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. Alistair says:

    Great line and great timing on the REDD stuff – congratulations and thanks,
    Alistair

  2. The Blog Diverse texts and short stories has awarded this Blog with the prize " Comprometidos Y Mas 2009"

  3. teresa says:

    Take away our trees,Take your breath of life away,all life is One

  4. Kye Swenson says:

    Landowners should get no subsidies out of this. The government should require these objectives as part of an eco-initiative that has to begin…and soon. Deforestation causes forest fires to multiply and is a major cause in polluting out environment.

  5. Dr Nigel Miles says:

    Dear All,
    If you would all like a copy of the SEEBIF Initiative which is a paradigm leap up from the REDD…good, bad or ugly version I will send you a copy.
    I produced this is corroboration with my esteemed colleagues of the Green Economic Institute in August 2009 as a paper presented at the celebrated Mansfield College, Oxford University and is currently being observed for endoresement by the United Nations Environment Programme.
    If you really want a change to the destructions with an initiative which offers a real way forward contact me for a copy.
    Best wishes to you all,
    Nigel Miles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.