Are You Ready for Ecosystem Failure and Resource Scarcity?

Home canning and self-sufficiencyIt use to be that stockpiling food and supplies, owning land and canning garden produce, and otherwise preparing for likely societal upheaval caused by ecosystem failure [search], resource scarcity [search], economic turmoil [search], pandemics [search] and other unknowns was seen as a bit kooky. But no longer as a “New Survivalism” emerges [ark] in response to widening recognition that the civilization we take for granted is but a thin veneer on existence.
What is increasingly evident is that stores of foods, tools and other supplies conducive to self-sufficiency [search] is just prudent — a type of insurance. People are relearning what it means to prepare for self-sufficiency and investing in energy frugal homes [ark], seeds and other self-evidently worthwhile protections for them and their family. There is no need to withdraw from society and arm yourself, though you may choose to do so. It just makes sense to be prepared even as we work to prevent global ecological and other crises.

You may also like...

8 Responses

  1. Which will occur first: a colossal ecological wreckage or a gigantic economic collapse?
    Here comes a scenario for economic disaster, I suppose.
    http://video.aol.com/video-detail/the-long-johns-the-last-laugh-george-parr-subprime/483770241
    A "sub prime" example of how the wealthy are destroying the world we inhabit ???
    Buddy, Can You Spare a Billion?
    By Dana Milbank
    The Washington Post
    Friday 04 April 2008
    Meet Alan Schwartz, welfare recipient.
    As the chief executive of Bear Stearns, he's getting rather more public assistance than your typical welfare mom – specifically, $30 billion in federal loan guarantees to help J.P. Morgan Chase take over his firm. But then, Schwartz has had rather more than his share of suffering of late.
    As his firm collapsed, he was forced to forgo his entire 2007 bonus, leaving his compensation for the past five years at a paltry $141 million, according to Business Week. Things have become so bad that, the Wall Street Journal discovered, Schwartz has had to rent out his 7,850-square-foot home on the ninth green of a suburban New York golf course – leaving the poor fellow with only his 17-room, seven-acre home in Greenwich, his condo in Colorado and the athletic center he built for Duke University.
    Schwartz's tale of woe tugs at the heartstrings all the more because he and his colleagues at Bear Stearns were, he believes, blameless for the bankruptcy of two hedge funds and the subsequent collapse of the 85-year-old investment bank. "I am saddened," Schwartz told the Senate banking committee yesterday. He was saddened that Bear Stearns was undone by "unfounded rumors and attendant speculation," despite its impeccable balance sheet.
    "Due to the stressed condition of the credit market as a whole and the unprecedented speed at which rumors and speculation travel and echo through the modern financial media environment, the rumors and speculation became a self-fulfilling prophecy," Schwartz told the senators. "There was, simply put, a run on the bank."
    Sen. Richard Shelby (R-Ala.) asked the corporate-welfare recipient whether he shares any blame for his indigent circumstances. "Do you believe that your management team has any responsibility for the company's collapse?"
    Schwartz could think of no missteps – not even his decision to remain at a conference at the Breakers in Palm Beach while his firm was imploding. "I just simply have not been able to come up with anything, even with the benefit of hindsight," said the blameless chief executive, escorted into the hearing room by superlawyer Robert Bennett.
    Fortunately for Schwartz, he had a sympathetic audience in the banking committee, whose members have received more than $20 million in campaign contributions from the securities and investment industry, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. "I want the witnesses to know, and others, that as a bottom-line consideration, I happen to believe that this was the right decision," Chairman Chris Dodd (D-$5,796,000) said before hearing a single word of testimony.
    "You made the right decision," Sen. Evan Bayh (D-$1,582,000) told the regulators who worked out the loan guarantee.
    "The actions had to be done," agreed Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-$6,162,000).
    Only a minority of senators, particularly those with smaller pieces of the campaign-cash pie, dissented. "That is socialism!" railed Sen. Jim Bunning (R-$452,000). "And it must not happen again."
    To the extent the lawmakers objected to the Bear Stearns bailout, they worried that the Fed's actions would create a "moral hazard" – an economic term of art – that, as Shelby put it, "encourages firms to take excessive risk based on the expectations that they will reap all the profits while the federal government stands ready to cover any losses if they fail."
    Shelby's notion was a curiosity for the senators, who don't often spend a lot of time worrying about moral hazards. No fewer than five other senators invoked the phrase. "I think the moral hazard was minimized," Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, one of the witnesses, reassured the senators.
    No moral hazard, however, would interfere with the lawmakers' compassion for the beleaguered Schwartz and his fellow witness, J.P. Morgan Chase's Jamie Dimon, who had given a combined $260,000 in political contributions in recent years – a small part of the $1.7 million their co-workers contributed in this election cycle alone. That's a sizable handout – but a good investment compared with the $30 billion federal hand-up.
    "On behalf of all of us here on this dais, our sympathies go out to your employees," Dodd told Schwartz after his opening statement. "There's no adequate way we can express our sorrow to them for what happened. Obviously, shareholders, same sort of feelings, but obviously the employees particularly. It's a particularly hard blow."
    Of course, some might consider $30 billion an adequate expression of sympathy, but Dodd was apologetic as he gently probed Schwartz. "You both will have forgotten more in the next 10 minutes than I'll ever probably understand about all of this," he told the witnesses, but didn't the irregular trading at Bear Stearns mean than "more than just rumors" were behind Bear Stearns's demise?
    "You could never get facts out as fast as the rumors," Schwartz explained. "It looked like there were people that wanted to induce panic."
    Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.J.) reminded Schwartz that two of the firm's funds went bankrupt in 2007. "It caused concern, not only here but on Wall Street," the senator said. "Did that dramatically alter your behavior?"
    Evidently not. "I'm not sure I understand the question," Schwartz

  2. Ray says:

    pssst, its still a bit kooky.

  3. Dr. Glen Barry says:

    No, kooky is starving to death or being raped and murdered during hard times (which always come eventually) because you did not have the foresight to plan ahead when the times were good.

  4. Ray says:

    Humanitys ability and willingness to respond with aid anywhere in the world within days is unparalelled. Also the percentage of people dying from starvation, illness or mayhem is smaller now then ever in our history…
    I agree one should plan for possible disaster which is exactly what we have become very good at doing.

  5. PeterW says:

    Ray that seems like a nice thought, but then I look at the world's response to Rwanda, Darfur, Congo, Somalia, AIDs, the floods in Bangladesh last year, etc. etc. Hell look at what happen with New Orleans. If anything the current world response to crisis has been appalling.
    Food prices around the world have shot up dramatically and no one seems to care.
    I don't think there's much evidence that the people of the world will come to anyone's rescue when things get really tough.

  6. Ray says:

    Peter, good grief dude have you no knowledge of history? Its litterd with dead bodies from famine, disease, typhoons earthquakes….you name the disaster, its wiped out whole societies.
    Put food cost in context with the past…How much of your day is spent feeding yourself compared to those born 500 years ago? I make enough money in one hour to over feed myself for the day. My great grand dad spent half a day, a thousand years ago they spent all day and often went to bed hungry.
    The human race has never in history enjoyed such longevity health or wealth…world wide but lets by all means continue to try to make it better.

  7. I just posted your latest piece on my site. We are in for big doo-doo, we have gone past the point of no return pretty much. There is a plan brewing, not pretty but must be, better than the one which would ensure if nature took her course. The global warming has little to do with what we are being told, it has to do with the entire solar system warming, changes in the sun et al from being in the photon belt. This is the end times, but not exactly as some expect. Give my website a try. Take care, Candace Frieze of Abundanthope

  8. Bruce F says:

    I agree with the analysis. What I'm pushing isn't as abstract.
    A few of us who live in the city of Chicago are trying to grow heirloom vegetables on our rooftops in cheap homemade self-watering containers. It sounds more than a little preposterous to suggest that what we're doing is a real solution, but it might be a tiny piece. We think they're a great way to build connections in a fragmented social/political landscape.
    I'm plugging it everywhere I go. Not selling anything, I'm giving “it” away.
    Here's the link – http://www.flickr.com/photos/7458996@N06/sets/72157603652656573/ . Next to the pics is a how-to guide with plenty of links.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.