Biofuel expansion threatens Europe’s wildlife as agricultural set-asides are to be scrapped

PRESS RELEASE
For immediate release -; 13th August 2007
Joint Press Release by Biofuelwatch, EcoInternet and Rainforest Rescue
Millions of farm birds could be left without enough food and breeding sites next spring if plans to scrap Europe's agricultural land set-aside targets for next year go ahead, warn environmental groups. Plans to set a zero set-aside targets from October this year have been announced by the EU Commissioner for Agriculture, Mariann Fischer-Boel, as a response to rising food prices. Those plans are to be ratified by ministers this autumn. Several studies confirm that set-asides have become a vital habitat for many of Europe's endangered birds and insects, and that farm birds have declined by nearly 50% on average since 1980. Over 5300 people have written to European politicians this month, asking for the plans to be dropped and supporting a moratorium on biofuel targets.
Glen Barry, Director of EcoInternet explains: "Dramatic declines in insect, bird and wild flower populations show that many of Europe's ecosystems are under extreme stress from intensive agriculture and climate change. Our future depends on protecting healthy ecosystems. We need real cuts in greenhouse gas emissions, with massive cuts in energy use as well as truly sustainable renewable energy, such as wind and solar power. More intensively farmed monocultures cannot be part of the solution."


Almuth Ernsting from Biofuelwatch adds "There is no doubt that the expansion in biofuels is pushing up food prices. The European Union are committed to stopping biodiversity losses by 2010 but those plans will almost certainly make this impossible. Our birds and insects must not be sacrificed for biofuel expansion. We need a moratorium on EU biofuel targets and incentives now -; and we need to keep our set asides until they can be replaced with better environmental safeguards."
Few environmental NGOs regard the current set-aside system, as being the ideal instrument for protecting farmland biodiversity, although it provides a safety net for many species. Many NGOs hope that a

You may also like...

3 Responses

  1. zephyr says:

    “Our future depends on protecting healthy ecosystems…..”
    This is the truth of it at this time.
    Every single one of us needs to cut back by at least 10% on our participation in fossil fuel-dependent activity.
    This is NOT a major sacrifice.
    It is common sense given the consequences of our continued denial of the connection between our deeply-ingrained patterns of consumption and the health of our life-support systems, many of which are already losing their capacity to process our waste.
    Cutting back by 10% is EASY to do and could be an interesting challenge if we would like to see it that way.
    If everyone would get involved at this level, it WOULD make a difference.
    Technology is NOT going to save the day here.

  2. I also agree technology wont save us – smart people will.. GLOBAL WARMING IS HERE… we need all to be aware of that

  3. miley Smarsh says:

    There is a website called kentuckyfriedearth.com that is reportedly getting a huge number of hits and neeeds to be protested. They make a mockery of a serious subject. Please do something about them. The AMS reports something like 127000 hits in first month.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.